The announcement by First Base that it is progressing its plans to incorporate a modular construction facility into the regeneration scheme at Silvertown is another bold example of a developer looking to take advantage of the opportunities presented by modular construction.
This is in line with the government’s recent white paper declaring that promoting more modular and factory-built homes forms part of its strategy for “fixing our broken housing market”.
However, the intervening period has seen both the legal landscape and construction market change considerably.
Modular housing leads to a considerable front loading of time and cost. The design and delivery of each module must be fixed at an early stage to allow the supply chain to be managed. This affects the payment profile of the project and makes the arrangements for the passing of title and risk for each module particularly significant. The quality of each module is not monitored in the course of the build, but is instead dependent upon the manufacturer’s quality assurance.
For contracts focusing on the provision of services, labour levels on site can be varied to manage the progress of elements of a build. This option is more limited when large modules need to be ordered, produced, delivered to and installed on site.
Modular construction presents a significant opportunity, but the industry will need to adjust so risks can be allocated appropriately between all parties in construction projects.
Mark Fletcher, associate solicitor (commercial litigation), Russell-Cooke